Someone whose opinion I respect
recently said: If you write about God, homoeroticism, Bob Dylan,
food, farming, bicycling, hiking, Thailand, sailing, climate change,
politics, film, science, philosophy, and travel you can't expect to
have an audience.
Me: Why not? Columnists say: “There
are stories every day. The hard part is picking which one to write.”
(I ruminate thoughtfully.) Also: Montaigne. Montaigne
could write about anything.
Then he asked: Yes, but how many sites
like that do you read?
I can cite several:
Sonia. Monika.
Annie.
Patty. Although I wish all of you did more writing about
homoeroticism and film and climate change.
But my friend may, in fact, be right,
because I don't seem to have much of an audience. Save you, dear
reader, whom I adore.
Now I am again writing about writing,
which--although it is a tag in my sidebar--tags that (I believe)
neatly and comprehensively sum up my chosen subject—is my least
favorite topic. John Gardner wrote about writing best. No one can
do it better. And he would eschew this genre.
But Montaigne would not. Montaigne
would have the world's most awesome blog.
I cite
Grillabongquixotic, again. What
sets his online log apart is not that he's building a boat in Mexico
and sailing it to Panama, although that helps. It's because having
that adventure sets him free to write about climate change, culture,
food, travel, linguistic experimentation, faith, dancing, wood grain,
automobiles, public transportation in foreign lands, music, and
depression. At a certain point in his adventure, he heads back to
New York, where he lives, much as I do, in a rural woodland. It may
be my favorite part of his story, and I miss the posts he didn't
write while he was there, the posts about food and music and
neighborhood bickering in a different context.
I want to write those posts now.
Okay, so I'm going to give in and admit
that this is my annual--although I try to make it biannual because I
hate it—apologia for the blog. It's been coming, for a while, as
you know.
Have you heard yet of
Aaron Swartz, who
developed RSS at fourteen and Reddit at nineteen? Who became an
activist and downloaded $2 million worth of data to distribute freely
to “children in the global South”? Who was prosecuted for that
crime and is now with us no more?
Here's what he said:
So here I am. We're somewhere over
a dark patch in the middle of the country and I'm in the window seat
in the last row in the plane. The guy in front of me's leaning all
the way back, but I'm in the last row so my seat doesn't go back, and
I have to lift my legs up to stretch out a muscle that was sitting
funny while I was asleep.... But that's not the problem.
This from his blog, cited in the New
Yorker profile, where Larissa MacFarquhar writes: “He kept a blog
for most of his life.” Also:
Prose creates a strong illusion
of presence—so strong that it is difficult to destroy it. It is
hard to remember that you are reading and not hearing. The illusion
is stronger when the prose is online, partly because you are aware
that it might be altered or redacted at any moment—the writer may
be online, too, as you read it [see I just redacted that
sentence]--and partly because the Internet has been around for such a
short time that we implicitly assume (as we do not with a book) that
the writer of a blog post is alive.
I am alive, but I will not always be
so. I am writing to you, but I do not know if you are there. I am
writing so you will know how it feels to be alive inside of this
body, with the peepers out the window over my left shoulder, with my
lamp lit, with only my computer and my New Yorker and my Holy Spirit
stained glass medallion to keep me company. I am writing from a
different dark patch in the northernmost part of the country and I'm
writing because writing is a practice, just one of many, and it's the
best way I have of marking time, if nothing else.
Aaron Swartz “didn't think of his
blog as published writing, exactly, nor was it a private journal,
since it was accessible to anyone. It was something in between. He
wrote about things in his blog that he didn't tell his friends—about
his depressions, about his ulcerative colitis. It was not clear who
he imagined his readers to be.”
Aaron Swartz wrote not just about
depression, but also how it felt to be a millionaire, his
insecurities, his politics, crying in the bathroom at work, music,
poverty, alcohol, and saving the world. Yes, he also killed himself,
as I've been reminded that writers do since I was a child—Ernest
Hemingway, Virginia Woolf, David Foster Wallace, Sylvia Plath, etc.
ad nauseum. Maybe it's because none of them kept a blog.
That's trite and untrue because of
course Aaron Swartz killed himself, too. My friend's point remains,
however, and I think it a valid one. If I refuse to limit my subject
matter to, oh, say—long-distance hiking or sailing around the world
or lushly photographed recipes—I can't expect an audience of any
significant size. But I'm done censoring myself. I do worry that I
am becoming too esoteric, too eclectic, too random. But I am in fact
all of those things.
Now I'll go shut up and watch Jon
Stewart.